Argument against Execution of Capital Punishment Essay

Argument against Execution of Capital Punishment - Essay ExampleUtilitarian believe that it is non morally permissible to punish criminals in order to give them what they deserve by exacting retribution on them. They have a problem with retribution in as it advocates the infliction of suffering without any compensating gain for happiness. This paper is going to analyze the utilitarians support for capital penalisation and hence argue against that support.They are of the view that if the death penalization can deter, then there is an auxiliary argument for its use. The statistical evidence is inconclusive. According to common sense, there are reasons for believing that the death penalty deters some would-be murderers from murdering. Van den Haags is the best proponent of this view terming it as the Best seem argument. He said that, If we value the saving of innocent lives more highly than the loss of the guilty, then to bet on a policy of capital punishment turns out to be rati onal. By doing an effective cost benefit analysis of capital punishment, we find that it has more disadvantages than advantages. To begin with, just by looking at the fact that those condemned to death do everything in their power to postpone it and to get their sentences reduced to long-term prison sentences, we are able to deduce that the death penalty is feared as an evil to be avoided. The society condemns murder as a serious offense. . Capital punishment is in itself murder as it involves killing. We can thence deduce that capital punishment is murder, and therefore it is wrong.